August 17, 2011

Jan Lokpal bill vs Govt. Lokpal bill

Govt’s Lokpal Bill Vs Jan Lokpal Bill: Comparative Chart

Rather than gunning for the corrupt and corruption, government’s Lokpal seems to be gunning for those who complain against corruption.

How will Government’s Lokpal work?

Suppose some citizen files a complaint to Lokpal against some corrupt government servant.

Before the investigations actually start, the government servant can file a cross complaint against the citizen straight to the special court, without any preliminary enquiry by any agency, that the complaint is false or frivolous. The government will provide free advocate to the government servant to file this case. The citizen will have to defend himself on his own!

Then there is stiffer punishment for the complainant than the corrupt government servant. If the Special Court concludes that the complaint is frivolous or false, the citizen faces a minimum of two years of punishment. But if the corruption charges against government servant are proved, there is a minimum of six months of punishment for the corrupt government servant!

Government’s Lokpal will have jurisdiction over all NGOs in the country but it will have jurisdiction over less then o.5% of all government employees.

Government argued that the Lokpal would get overwhelmed with too many cases if all public servants were brought under its ambit. So, government has restricted its jurisdiction only to 65,000 Group A officers. Also, state employees will not be covered by Lokpal. There are 4 million central government employees and 8 million state government employees.

In sharp contrast, all NGOs are covered under government’s Lokpal, small or big, whether in state or centre. Even unregistered groups of people in remote villages are covered under the ambit of Lokpal. So, in a remote village, if a group of youngsters detect corruption in panchayat works using RTI, the youngsters can be hauled up by Lokpal but Lokpal would not have jurisdiction over Sarpanch, BDO or their corruption.

Whereas Lokpal would not have jurisdiction over Delhi government officials, it would have jurisdiction over all RWAs in Delhi. All small neighborhood groups who raise donations to do Ramlila or Durga Puja would be under Lokpal’s scanner.

Lokpal could haul up activists from any of the farmers, labour, anti-corruption, land, tribal or any other movements. All the movements whether registered or not, are under the jurisdiction of Lokpal.

There are 4.3 lakh registered NGOs. But there would be several million unregistered groups across the country. Lokpal would have jurisdiction over all of them.

No one can dispute the fact that corruption in NGOs needs to be addressed. But how can you leave most public servants out of Lokpal’s purview but bring NGOs upto village level within its purview?

Issue

Our view

Government’s view

Comments

Prime Minister

Lokpal should have power to investigate allegations of corruption against PM. Special safeguards provided against frivolous and mischievous complaints

PM kept out of Lokpal’s purview.

As of today, corruption by PM can be investigated under Prevention of Corruption Act. Government wants investigations to be done by CBI, which comes directly under him, rather than independent Lokpal

Judiciary

Lokpal should have powers to investigate allegation of corruption against judiciary. Special safeguards provided against frivolous and mischievous complaints

Judiciary kept out of Lokpal purview.

Government wants this to be included in Judicial Accountability Bill (JAB). Under JAB, permission to enquire against a judge will be given by a three member committee (two judges from the same court and retd Chief justice of the same court). There are many such flaws in JAB. We have no objections to judiciary being included in JAB if a strong and effective JAB were considered and it were enacted simultaneously.

MPs

Lokpal should be able to investigate allegations that any MP had taken bribe to vote or speak in Parliament.

Government has excluded this from Lokpal’s purview.

Taking bribe to vote or speak in Parliament strikes at the foundations of our democracy. Government’s refusal to bring it under Lokpal scrutiny virtually gives a license to MPs to take bribes with impunity.

Grievance redressal

Violation of citizen’s charter (if an officer does not do a citizen’s work in prescribed time) by an officer should be penalized and should be deemed to be corruption.

No penalties proposed. So, this will remain only on paper.

Government had agreed to our demand in the Joint committee meeting on 23rd May. It is unfortunate they have gone back on this decision.

CBI

Anti-corruption branch of CBI should be merged into Lokpal.

Government wants to retain its hold over CBI.

CBI is misused by governments. Recently, govt has taken CBI out of RTI, thus further increasing the scope for corruption in CBI. CBI will remain corrupt till it remains under government’s control

Selection of Lokpal members

1. Broad based selection committee with 2 politicians, four judges and two independent constitutional authorities.

1. With five out of ten members from ruling establishment and six politicians in selection committee, government has

Government’s proposal ensures that the government will be able to appoint its own people as Lokpal members and Chairperson. Interestingly, they had agreed to the selection committee

2. An independent search committee consisting of retd constitutional authorities to prepare first list.

3. A detailed transparent and participatory selection process.

ensured that only weak, dishonest and pliable people would be selected.

2. Search committee to be selected by selection committee, thus making them a pawn of selection committee

3. No selection process provided. It will completely depend on selection committee

proposed by us in the meeting held on 7th May. There was also a broad consensus on selection process. However, there was a disagreement on composition of search committee. We are surprised that they have gone back on the decision.

Who will Lokpal be accountable to?

To the people. A citizen can make a complaint to Supreme Court and seek removal.

To the Government. Only government can seek removal of Lokpal

With selection and removal of Lokpal in government’s control, it would virtually be a puppet in government’s hands, against whose seniormost functionaries it is supposed to investigate, thus causing serious conflict of interest.

Integrity of Lokpal staff

Complaint against Lokpal staff will be heard by an independent authority

Lokpal itself will investigate complaints against its own staff, thus creating serious conflicts of interest

Government’s proposal creates a Lokpal, which is accountable either to itself or to the government. We have suggested giving these controls in the hands of the citizens.

Method of enquiry

Method would be the same as provided in CrPC like in any other criminal case. After preliminary enquiry, an FIR will be registered. After investigations, case will be presented before a court, where the trial will take place

CrPC being amended. Special protection being provided to the accused. After preliminary enquiry, all evidence will be provided to the accused and he shall be heard as to why an FIR should not be regd against him. After completion of investigations, again all evidence will be provided to him and he will be given a hearing to explain why a case should not be filed against him in the court. During investigations, if

Investigation process provided by the government would severely compromise all investigations. If evidence were made available to the accused at various stages of investigations, in addition to compromising the investigations, it would also reveal the identity of whistleblowers thus compromising their security. Such a process is unheard of in criminal jurisprudence anywhere in the world. Such process would kill almost every case.

investigations are to be started against any new persons, they would also be presented with all evidence against them and heard.

Lower bureaucracy

All those defined as public servants in Prevention of Corruption Act would be covered. This includes lower bureaucracy.

Only Group A officers will be covered.

One fails to understand government’s stiff resistance against bringing lower bureaucracy under Lokpal’s ambit. This appears to be an excuse to retain control over CBI because if all public servants are brought under Lokpal’s jurisdiction, government would have no excuse to keep CBI.

Lokayukta

The same bill should provide for Lokpal at centre and Lokayuktas in states

Only Lokpal at the centre would be created through this Bill.

According to Mr Pranab Mukherjee, some of the CMs have objected to providing Lokayuktas through the same Bill. He was reminded that state Information Commissions were also set up under RTI Act through one Act only.

Whistleblower protection

Lokpal will be required to provide protection to whistleblowers, witnesses and victims of corruption

No mention in this law.

According to govt, protection for whistleblowers is being provided through a separate law. But that law is so bad that it has been badly trashed by standing committee of Parliament last month. The committee was headed by Ms Jayanthi Natrajan. In the Jt committee meeting held on 23rd May, it was agreed that Lokpal would be given the duty of providing protection to whistleblowers under the other law and that law would also be discussed and improved in joint committee only. However, it did not happen.

Special benches in HC

High Courts will set up special benches to hear appeals in corruption cases to fast track them

No such provision.

One study shows that it takes 25 years at appellate stage in corruption cases. This ought to be addressed.

CrPC

On the basis of past experience on why anti-corruption cases take a long time in courts and

Not included

why do our agencies lose them, some amendments to CrPC have been suggested to prevent frequent stay orders.

Dismissal of corrupt government servant

After completion of investigations, in addition to filing a case in a court for prosecution, a bench of Lokpal will hold open hearings and decide whether to remove the government servant from job.

The minister will decide whether to remove a corrupt officer or not. Often, they are beneficiaries of corruption, especially when senior officer are involved. Experience shows that rather than removing corrupt people, ministers have rewarded them.

Power of removing corrupt people from jobs should be given to independent Lokpal rather than this being decided by the minister in the same department.

Punishment for corruption

1. Maximum punishment is ten years

2. Higher punishment if rank of accused is higher

3. Higher fines if accused are business entities

4. If successfully convicted, a business entity should be blacklisted from future contracts.

None of these accepted. Only maximum punishment raised to 10 years.

Financial independence

Lokpal 11 members collectively will decide how much budget do they need

Finance ministry will decide the quantum of budget

This seriously compromises with the financial independence of Lokpal

Prevent further loss

Lokpal will have a duty to take steps to prevent corruption in any ongoing activity, if brought to his notice. If need be, Lokpal will obtain orders from High Court.

No such duties and powers of Lokpal

2G is believed to have come to knowledge while the process was going on. Shouldn’t some agency have a duty to take steps to stop further corruption rather than just punish people later?

Tap phones

Lokpal bench will grant permission to do so

Home Secretary would grant permission.

Home Secretary is under the control of precisely those who would be under scanner. It would kill investigations.

Delegation of powers

Lokpal members will only hear cases against senior officers and

All work will be done by 11 members of Lokpal. Practically no

This is a sure way to kill Lokpal. The members will not be able to handle all cases. Within no time,

politicians or cases involving huge amounts. Rest of the work will be done by officers working under Lokpal

delegation.

they would be overwhelmed.

NGOs

Only government funded NGOs covered

All NGOs, big or small, are covered.

A method to arm twist NGOs

False, Frivolous and vexatious complaints

No imprisonment. Only fines on complainants. Lokpal would decide whether a complaint is frivolous or vexatious or false.

Two to five years of imprisonment and fine. The accused can file complaint against complainant in a court. Interestingly, prosecutor and all expenses of this case will be provided by the government to the accused. The complainant will also have to pay a compensation to the accused.

This will give a handle to every accused to browbeat complainants. Often corrupt people are rich. They will file cases against complainants and no one will dare file any complaint. Interestingly, minimum punishment for corruption is six months but for filing false complaint is two years.

June 29, 2010

FIFA Football World Cup 2010

Brazil, Argentina, Germany and Spain are the teams to watch out for in this world cup...
It has been great football for the past 2 weeks and some more great stuff to come.
I learnt a lot about football this world cup. Things like Players need to run around 10 kms in a match with avg speed of around 20km/hr and lot of fouls go unnoticed by the referee as there is no technology used and hence two teams needs lot of luck if they are equally balanced.
Germany were able to beat England just through their sheer speed. The England mid-field and defence looked lousy... Brazil Portugal match during the group stage was very lousy as both teams were playing it safe and didn't want to show their weaknesses.
Too many star players is very dangerous for any team. Playing as a "team" is very important.
Few things that can help get a world-class football team:
1. Train the players from a very young age (8-10 yrs)
2. Stamina - Should be able to run 20 kms everyday with a speed of 20 kms/hr
3. There should be a few forwards who are very tall to take headers during corner kick.
4. Shorter people like Maradona & Messi are able to control the ball and are not easy to stop. They tackle better. Hence a set of short players.
5. Mid-field should be very strong and well-built and should be able to run all over the ground and never get tired.
5. Talent is most important. Players should be passionate about football.
Our government in India needs to sponsor 100 talented potential players at a very young age and take care of all their needs and I am pretty sure atleast 20 of these players will shine. All this needs 10 years of dedication and action!

October 28, 2009

Fern a day will keep the doctor away!

The seedless plant Azolla (fern from South America) has high nutrition value and increases immunity. Came across this article written by G Manjusainath of Deccan Herald. St. John's hospital has decided to recommend to the state government to allow usage of the fern, Azolla in food to boost people's immunity and nutrition levels. Dr Sunny Chunkapura says it has been researched across the globe. It is being grown extensively by the Community medicine department at St. John's hospital, Bengaluru.
You can make "chutney" of it or add it in any food to increase the nutrition level in your diet. It is quite good for diabetic patients cause it has no starch or fat but only the high nutrition elements. This fern is very helpful for HIV/AIDS patients.
This fern grows in water and needs very little space. Even a tub of water is enough and anyone can grow it at home.

April 28, 2009

Facts about Swine Flu

http://www.cdc.gov/swineflu/key_facts.htm
What is Swine Influenza?
Swine Influenza (swine flu) is a respiratory disease of pigs caused by type A influenza virus that regularly causes outbreaks of influenza in pigs. Swine flu viruses cause high levels of illness and low death rates in pigs. Swine influenza viruses may circulate among swine throughout the year, but most outbreaks occur during the late fall and winter months similar to outbreaks in humans.
How common is swine flu infection in humans?
In the past, CDC received reports of approximately one human swine influenza virus infection every one to two years in the U.S., but from December 2005 through February 2009, 12 cases of human infection with swine influenza have been reported.
What are the symptoms of swine flu in humans?
The symptoms of swine flu in people are expected to be similar to the symptoms of regular human seasonal influenza and include fever, lethargy, lack of appetite and coughing. Some people with swine flu also have reported runny nose, sore throat, nausea, vomiting and diarrhea.
Can people catch swine flu from eating pork?
No. Swine influenza viruses are not transmitted by food. You can not get swine influenza from eating pork or pork products. Eating properly handled and cooked pork and pork products is safe. Cooking pork to an internal temperature of 160°F kills the swine flu virus as it does other bacteria and viruses.
How does swine flu spread?
Influenza viruses can be directly transmitted from pigs to people and from people to pigs. Human infection with flu viruses from pigs are most likely to occur when people are in close proximity to infected pigs, such as in pig barns and livestock exhibits housing pigs at fairs. Human-to-human transmission of swine flu can also occur. This is thought to occur in the same way as seasonal flu occurs in people, which is mainly person-to-person transmission through coughing or sneezing of people infected with the influenza virus. People may become infected by touching something with flu viruses on it and then touching their mouth or nose.
What do we know about human-to-human spread of swine flu?
In September 1988, a previously healthy 32-year-old pregnant woman was hospitalized for pneumonia and died 8 days later. A swine H1N1 flu virus was detected. Four days before getting sick, the patient visited a county fair swine exhibition where there was widespread influenza-like illness among the swine.
In follow-up studies, 76% of swine exhibitors tested had antibody evidence of swine flu infection but no serious illnesses were detected among this group. Additional studies suggest that one to three health care personnel who had contact with the patient developed mild influenza-like illnesses with antibody evidence of swine flu infection.
How can human infections with swine influenza be diagnosed?
To diagnose swine influenza A infection, a respiratory specimen would generally need to be collected within the first 4 to 5 days of illness (when an infected person is most likely to be shedding virus). However, some persons, especially children, may shed virus for 10 days or longer. Identification as a swine flu influenza A virus requires sending the specimen to CDC for laboratory testing.
What medications are available to treat swine flu infections in humans?
There are four different antiviral drugs that are licensed for use in the US for the treatment of influenza: amantadine, rimantadine, oseltamivir and zanamivir. While most swine influenza viruses have been susceptible to all four drugs, the most recent swine influenza viruses isolated from humans are resistant to amantadine and rimantadine. At this time, CDC recommends the use of oseltamivir or zanamivir for the treatment and/or prevention of infection with swine influenza viruses.

April 18, 2009

Whom should I vote for?

The ideal person to vote is a person who is honest, who understands and works for the development of the society.

However it is hard to find such a person. There might be independent candidates who might be good, but it is not practical to vote for an independent candidate as today our nation needs political stability and not a coalition government; which all the time hankers for power and wastes everyone's time and tax payers' money.

In Karnataka, there has always been political instability and most of the governments have never done anything good for the common people.
But since we have to vote, I think it is better trying out our "luck" by voting for the ruling party in the state so that atleast we get some more visibility in the center. Yeah it is not the best decision, but a decision based on practicalities.

It is high time that we change our political system to a 3 party system similar to the US to provide greater stability and to make the politicians answerable to their actions.

We don't need to divide our votes based on religion, caste. We just need good people!

Few of parameters to think about before voting:
1. Does the party we vote for have a good leader? Manmohan Singh/Sonia vs L.K Advani/Modi
2. Does the party have a good track record in implementing their development agenda?
3. How will the country benefit by voting this person/party to power?

Will power

Do you have the will power? Can you do something once you have decided to do it... I mean something realistic...
What it needs is determination, dedication & discipline!
The problem again is life is uncertain... You could only plan on 60% of your activities as things are too fast to catch up in this fast paced world.
We decide on something and suddenly something else comes in the way and our focus is diverted.. Thus we might lose on the "dedication" that we had started with, however "discipline" can come to our rescue by re-allocating the "dedication"!! And Yes ofcourse "determination" is a mind game! But if you practice your mind to do the thing you have set forth to do, you can get used to it and no longer need the "determination" rather it becomes a habit!
So you start of with determination, then be (disciplined <-> dedicated) and make your determination a habit until you succeed!
Thats the secret of being successful! So finally nothing is impossible. All that it needs is "realistic planning" and the 3 D's